cvs commit: ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster/files portmaster.sh.in
Henrik Brix Andersen
brix at FreeBSD.org
Thu Jan 24 12:26:27 PST 2008
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 12:11:15PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
>> Hi Doug,
>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 02:36:58AM +0000, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> dougb 2008-01-24 02:36:58 UTC
>>> FreeBSD ports repository
>>> Modified files: (Branch: 2.0)
>>> ports-mgmt/portmaster/files portmaster.sh.in Log:
>>> The code for this 2.0 version has been totally reorganized, and
>>> in several cases totally rewritten. I am also glad to say that
>>> all of the advertised features now work as advertised. :)
>> Did you just branch the ports CVS repo?
> No, it's just a version number bump. AFAICT the "branch" stuff above is
> added by the script that generates the e-mail. If you look at the cvs logs
> themselves you can see that there are no branches.
> But your concern is reasonable, I had a moment of panic myself when I saw
> the e-mail. :)
Yeah, looks a bit odd - I wonder why the revision number of that file
was suddently bumped from 1.28 to 2.0  by CVS...
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix at FreeBSD.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 209 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/attachments/20080124/d2ae8298/attachment.pgp
More information about the cvs-ports