cvs commit: ports/www/eyeos Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
sat at FreeBSD.org
Tue Dec 19 16:24:18 PST 2006
On 12/20/06, Alexander Botero-Lowry <alexbl at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > sat 2006-12-19 21:19:05 UTC
> > FreeBSD ports repository
> > Modified files:
> > www/eyeos Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
> > Log:
> > - Update to 0.9.3-5.wink.at.nivit.;)
> Approved by: nivit ?
> When committing to another person's port that you're not the maintainer
> of, you need to put approved by, even if the approval is implicit. That's
> what (implicit) is for.
This makes no sense at all. My mission is to confuse
people, not enlighten them. Hmm, maybe it's time to
devise something more elaborate, like
Re-approved by: ports@ (ex-maintainer, placeholder; timeout - SNR too low)
Of course it would draw more attention, but at least
suggestions will be more complex.
Or maybe I should try to apply the theory behind one
of the latest eurobsdcon talks  to ports.
Or should I just stop reading all the feedback to my
ever so rare commits and rather expect something in
the spirit of "he had it coming" when I annoy people
enough for them to give me some metal.
Anyways, to me sleep is of top priority right now,
so good night, I wish you all to learn to stop
worrying and love... something...
More information about the cvs-ports