cvs commit: ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached Makefile distinfo
mat at mat.cc
Sat Sep 24 03:05:15 PDT 2005
+-le 22/09/2005 20:40 +0200, Anton Berezin écrivait :
| On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:40:36AM +0800, Yen-Ming Lee wrote:
|> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 07:48:34AM +0000, Anton Berezin wrote:
|> > tobez 2005-09-22 07:48:34 UTC
|> > FreeBSD ports repository
|> > Modified files:
|> > databases/p5-Cache-Memcached Makefile distinfo
|> > Log:
|> > Update to 1.15. Require perl from ports. Assign maintainer to perl at .
|> > Revision Changes Path
|> > 1.7 +7 -11 ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached/Makefile
|> > 1.3 +2 -2 ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached/distinfo
|> Just curious...
|> Is it a policy to assign maintainer to perl@ for the ports@ owned p5-*
| Not really, it's a matter of personal preference. I did not feel like
| having a maintainer lock on some of those ports, but I did not want them
| to stay unmaintained, either. There is, I think, a better chance that
| someone (myself included) will take care of such when they belong to
| perl@ as opposed to ports at .
In other words, you want them maintained, but not by you ;-)
More information about the cvs-ports