cvs commit: ports MOVED

Pav Lucistnik pav at FreeBSD.org
Sat Sep 3 15:00:57 PDT 2005


Kris Kennaway píše v so 03. 09. 2005 v 17:58 -0400:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:50:04PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Ade Lovett p??e v p? 02. 09. 2005 v 19:57 +0000:
> > > ade         2005-09-02 19:57:20 UTC
> > > 
> > >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > > 
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     .                    MOVED 
> > >   Log:
> > >   Add entry for devel/bison -> devel/bison175, otherwise Really Bad[tm]
> > >   things are going to happen when portupgrade (and others) try to
> > >   bring in the new 2.0
> > >   
> > >   Forgotten by:   pav
> > 
> > Eh? Explain?
> > 
> > I want to get bison updated to 2.0 on as many boxes as possible.
> > Is there a problem with that?
> > 
> > Please revert.
> 
> I also hope you're not planning a major upgrade like this before
> 6.0-RELEASE (and without careful testing).

I did actually built all ports that uses bison before committing this
update, and I found single failure, which I handled using bison175 port.

More to say, that MOVED line does not prevent portupgrade from updating
to 2.0, just tested it. I'd love to know the reasoning behind Ade's
commit.

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
              <pav at FreeBSD.org>

And now something completely different.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/attachments/20050904/18b2afe9/attachment.bin


More information about the cvs-ports mailing list