cvs commit: ports/editors/vim Makefile distinfo

[Jeremy Messenger]

On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:55:03 -0500, Christian Brueffer  
<chris at unixpages.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:57:51PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
>> David O'Brien píše v po 17. 10. 2005 v 12:53 -0700:
>> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:34:05PM +0200, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 07:12:07PM +0000, David E. O'Brien wrote:
>> > > > obrien      2005-10-17 19:12:07 UTC
>> > > >
>> > > >   FreeBSD ports repository
>> > > >
>> > > >   Modified files:
>> > > >     editors/vim          Makefile distinfo
>> > > >   Log:
>> > > >   Update to Vim 6.3 patchlevel 90
>> > >
>> > > Out of curiosity, why you didn't update it to 6.4 ?
>> >
>> > To give one last checkpoint in case 6.4 has bugs and someone might  
>> want
>> > to slip back to 6.3.
>> >
>> > I'm also not sure if we should create a vim63 port for a short time.
>> > Opinions?
>>
>> Nah, just hit 6.4 right away.
>>
>
> Famous last words :-)  I think a vim63 port would be reasonable until
> 64 has a few patchlevels more.

6.4 is just a bugfix release, no feature add. It means that all of  
patchlevels in 6.3 should be merged in 6.4. How exactly would it makes any  
difference for 6.3+patches and 6.4? I would understand if it was for 6.x  
and 7.x, but not 6.3 and 6.4.

Cheers,
Mezz


-- 
mezz7 at cox.net  -  mezz at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/  -  gnome at FreeBSD.org