cvs commit: ports/games/quake2lnx Makefile distinfo pkg-message pkg-plist ports/games/quake2lnx/files extra-patch-src_rogue_g__local.h extra-patch-src_rogue_q__shared.c extra-patch-src_xatrix_q__shared.c patch-Makefile patch-src::game::g_phys.c patch-src::linux::gl_glx.c patch-src::linux::rw_in_svgalib.c ...

[Pav Lucistnik]

Alexey Dokuchaev píše v čt 17. 11. 2005 v 13:31 +0000:

> >   PR:             ports/87181
> >   Submitted by:   Alejandro Pulver <alejandro at varnet.biz>
> >   Approved by:    maintainer timeout
> 
> Edwin,
> 
> I wish I could say "thanks" for work you've done, but I would appreciate
> private confirmation mail even in case of "maintainer timeout".  This is
> a complicated port, and such a change is potentially harmful due to its
> massiveness.  Commits like this should probably be done per-piece fashion,
> otherwise it's really hard to check if nothing got broken.  Not to
> mention that I actually disagree on the number of changes suggested in
> the PR (and committed by you).
> 
> I'm not asking for a backout, in fact I realize how annoying it can be
> when PR hangs in "open" state for a month(s), and I would have probably
> needed to change PR state to something like "working on it, please be
> patient", however, I must say I got somewhat frustrated to have to fix
> all those things that I don't like WRT this commit.

So why have you not handled the PR yourself? Is 36 days really not
enough to sort out a single port PR?

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
              <pav at FreeBSD.org>

Just because you're an angel doesn't mean you have to be a fool.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/attachments/20051117/98b7ccf1/attachment.bin