cvs commit: ports/databases/evolution-data-server/files patch-addressbook_backends_groupwise_e-book-backend-groupwise.c patch-addressbook_backends_ldap_e-book-backend-ldap.c patch-calendar_backends_groupwise_e-cal-backend-groupwise.c patch-camel-groupwise-folder.c patch-camel-groupwise-utils.c patch-libedataserverui_e-name-selector-entry.c patch-servers-exchange-storage-e-folder-exchange.c patch-servers-groupwise-e-gw-connection.c patch-servers-groupwise-e-gw-item.c

[Pav Lucistnik]

Joe Marcus Clarke píše v čt 10. 11. 2005 v 12:27 -0500:
> On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 09:39 +0000, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > pav         2005-11-10 09:39:15 UTC
> > 
> >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > 
> >   Modified files:
> >     databases/evolution-data-server/files 
> >                                           patch-addressbook_backends_ldap_e-book-backend-ldap.c 
> >   Added files:
> >     databases/evolution-data-server/files 
> >                                           patch-addressbook_backends_groupwise_e-book-backend-groupwise.c 
> >                                           patch-calendar_backends_groupwise_e-cal-backend-groupwise.c 
> >                                           patch-camel-groupwise-folder.c 
> >                                           patch-camel-groupwise-utils.c 
> >                                           patch-libedataserverui_e-name-selector-entry.c 
> >                                           patch-servers-exchange-storage-e-folder-exchange.c 
> >                                           patch-servers-groupwise-e-gw-connection.c 
> >                                           patch-servers-groupwise-e-gw-item.c 
> >   Log:
> >   - Fix build on 4.X
> 
> I didn't want to do this.  It's clear the Evo people don't want these
> patches, and it will be too difficult to maintain them from version to
> version.  We don't support Evo on 4.X anymore, and these patches should
> be dropped.

I needed this for a new port that used pygnomeextras.  This was a single
port I needed to fix.  Does this mean that committers are free to stop
testing ports on 4.X?

If the patches do not apply after the next release, you're free to just
delete them.

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
              <pav at FreeBSD.org>

Mischief managed.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/attachments/20051111/c4e8d4ac/attachment.bin