cluster vs. PORTREVISION (Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/djvulibre...)

Mikhail Teterin mi+kde at
Sat Jul 16 14:07:17 GMT 2005

On Saturday 16 July 2005 01:36 am, Kris Kennaway wrote:
= The cluster does mind, because I do not have enough machines to waste
= cycles on gratuitous rebuilds.  Also, the FTP sites mind when the
= waste bandwidth on gratuitous downloads.

But the package-building scripts _can_ be modified to track dependencies
without relying on PORTREVISION, cat they not? And portupgrade does not
need the variable either.

Also, for releases you do a full rebuild from scratch anyway too, right?


More information about the cvs-ports mailing list