cvs commit: ports/comms/zmtx-zmrx Makefile distinfo

[Erwin Lansing]

On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 12:28:22AM +0800, Xin LI wrote:
> > 
> > Not "a lot", but perhaps some.  This is of course better than blindly
> > committing a change that may be someone's attempt to introduce
> > malicious code into the ports tree, as has happened in the past.
> 
> Since the patchset was submitted by I, so I think I should say something
> for pav at ...  I have diff'ed between the two archives so I'd say we won't
> worry about new malicious code to have been introduced at this time :-)

Thanks for clarifying this. I guess mentioning this in the PR next time
will avoid this confusion :-)

Kris' point is still valid though. Pav should have checked himself as a
committer or asked you.
> 
> > > > Did you ask the maintainer?
> > > 
> > > No.
> 
> But the MAINTAINER= line was ports at FreeBSD.org, which means nobody

Asked the maintainer and/or submitter was implicit in Kris' question.

> cares about it.  I think it's Ok to grab maintainership since I used
> this tool actively.  There's no PR against this port after 5 weeks
> of the deprecation, and I just don't want it to be removed from the
> ports collection that early...
> 
That would be great, thanks.

-erwin

-- 
Erwin Lansing

DISCLAIMER:
No electrons were harmed while sending this message.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/attachments/20050706/71d376a7/attachment.bin