cvs commit: ports/chinese/BBMan Makefile ports/chinese/CJK Makefile ports/chinese/arnettf Makefile ports/chinese/arphicttf Makefile ports/chinese/auto-tw-l10n Makefile ports/chinese/bg5pdf Makefile ports/chinese/big5fs Makefile ports/chinese/chinput3 ...

[Ceri Davies]

On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 04:58:33PM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> +-le 08/01/2005 15:50 +0000, Sergey Matveychuk ?crivait :
> |   Log:
> |   - Pass maintainership to submitter
> 
> I fail to see the point of such a commit, I mean, without any update to the
> ports. Giving a port to someone making an update is good, but giving a whole
> bunch of ports just for giving them is doing no good I think.

It means that people (and the numerous nag scripts) can contact the
correct maintainer, and that PRs don't get assigned to the wrong person.
That's plenty reason enough.

Ceri
-- 
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm
not sure about the former.			  -- Einstein (attrib.)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/attachments/20050108/7649daf8/attachment.bin