cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabext

Michael Nottebrock michaelnottebrock at
Mon Apr 11 13:22:11 PDT 2005

On Monday, 11. April 2005 21:20, Doug Barton wrote:
> Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > I believe emphatically that the sanity tests should be non-optional.
> And I believe emphatically the opposite. And your comment about the
> procmail filter is totally unsuitable for those who pay for their bandwidth
> by the byte. The more burdens you add to ports maintainers the fewer of
> them we will be able to attract.

Note that the automatic mails people are discussing here would be sent to the 
*committer*, not the maintainer - and as a ports-committer, you pretty much 
have opted in to receive (and read, too!) all sorts of mails regarding your 
work when you accepted the commit bit. It's a punishment after all.

   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     |
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the cvs-ports mailing list