cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl
Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabext
michaelnottebrock at gmx.net
Mon Apr 11 13:22:11 PDT 2005
On Monday, 11. April 2005 21:20, Doug Barton wrote:
> Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > I believe emphatically that the sanity tests should be non-optional.
> And I believe emphatically the opposite. And your comment about the
> procmail filter is totally unsuitable for those who pay for their bandwidth
> by the byte. The more burdens you add to ports maintainers the fewer of
> them we will be able to attract.
Note that the automatic mails people are discussing here would be sent to the
*committer*, not the maintainer - and as a ports-committer, you pretty much
have opted in to receive (and read, too!) all sorts of mails regarding your
work when you accepted the commit bit. It's a punishment after all.
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi at freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/attachments/20050411/53ae673f/attachment.bin
More information about the cvs-ports