cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl
Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabext
adamw at FreeBSD.org
Mon Apr 11 10:58:29 PDT 2005
Florent Thoumie wrote:
> Le Monday 11 April 2005 à 15:23 +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu a écrit :
>>On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:18:16 -0400
>>"Dan Langille" <dan at langille.org> wrote:
>>>On 11 Apr 2005 at 8:04, David E. O'Brien wrote:
>>>>obrien 2005-04-11 08:04:41 UTC
>>>> FreeBSD ports repository
>>>FreshPorts tells me that these ports were broken by this commit:
>> [ ... ]
>>Next time I won't bother to make a list then :)
>>flz has fixed a few, but pav suggest that the obrien might want to
>>back-out the commit so he won't fix more of them until obrien decides.
> Well, actually I'm going to fix all of these.
> He raised an interesting issue, fixing is better than backout
> the commit. The number of broken ports isn't so high.
> /me raises mutex.
I'd recommend fixing the ports. If obrien does decide to back out his
commit, the number of fixed ports is small compared to the number of
changed ports. There is probably also a significant amount of time
before the backout will take place.
adamw at magnesium.net || adamw at FreeBSD.org
adamw at vectors.cx || adamw at gnome.org
More information about the cvs-ports