cvs commit: ports/devel/libvanessa_adt Makefile pkg-plist ports/devel/libvanessa_adt/files patch-ltmain.sh

[Michael Nottebrock]

On Wednesday 24 March 2004 17:57, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> V st, 24. 03. 2004 v 17:50, David O'Brien píše:
> > Agreed WRT bumping PORTREVISION.  Why does it seem almost all ports
> > committers today think PORTREVISION must be bumped with ever single
> > commit??  This does nothing but cause unnecessary great churn when using
> > pkg_version and portupgrade.
>
> PORTREVISION should be raised when there's a change (even minor) in the
> package. Axing a file from plist is a good reason for PORTREVISION
> raise.

Not really.

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html#AEN437

has the details - look at the rule of thumb at the end of the paragraph. Also, 
could we please refrain from the gratuitous generalisations, this isn't 
helping anything.

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/attachments/20040324/c357334a/attachment.bin