cvs commit: ports/x11-wm/fluxbox Makefile

[Roman Bogorodskiy]

 Adam wrote:

> And FWIW, seeing as how the old fluxbox will never get another update, I
> really don't think that x11-wm/fluxbox should be kept in the tree any
> longer; I think that x11-wm/fluxbox-devel should overwrite
> x11-wm/fluxbox immediately. </can of worms>

Agreed. Anyway, if many people want to see fluxbox in the ports tree it
could be returned, doesn't it? 

As for fluxbox-devel -> fluxbox repocopy right now I think that it's a
good idea, becouse fluxbox-devel seems to be even more stable than fluxbox 
and it's supported by developers. 

PS I don't really want to start a war simular to the shells/bash* one :-)

-Roman Bogorodskiy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/attachments/20040812/1524bcfe/attachment.bin