cvs commit: ports/audio/sox Makefile ports/audio/sweep Makefile ports/audio/normalize Makefile ports/audio/mpg321 Makefile ports/audio/xmms-mad Makefile ports/audio/py-mad Makefile ...

Joe Marcus Clarke marcus at FreeBSD.org
Mon Dec 8 08:56:20 PST 2003


On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 03:25, FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
> At Mon, 08 Dec 2003 01:50:01 -0500,
> Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > For the most part, you don't need to.  All of the ports that used libmad
> > by default got the bump.  Not all users have mad installed, after all. 
> > However, if you use portupgrade, the old shared libs are preserved by
> > default, so initially there shouldn't be a problem.
> 
> Yes they will continue to work but this is not the point.
> I believe any port which depends on different library should have
> different PORTREVISION because they might work differently.

But the default end package is unchanged by the mad change.

> 
> Do you think the benefits of new library are not worth to mention for
> users of "no mad by default" ports?

I don't think non-mad users would want to rebuild all ports that _could_
use mad.

Joe

-- 
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team	::	marcus at FreeBSD.org
gnome at FreeBSD.org
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/attachments/20031208/6e2442d6/attachment.bin


More information about the cvs-ports mailing list