cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/bsdinstall chapter.sgml

[Glen Barber]

On 10/9/11 8:37 PM, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> On 2011.10.09. 19:32, Glen Barber wrote:
>> Consistent pre-populated commit messages:  Another reason conversion to
>> SVN would be a "Good Thing(Tm).":-)
> What's wrong with the current template? What does SVN do better? No
> criticism, just curiosity because I haven't noticed any difference.
> 

SVN consistently populates the commit message with certain fields;
Reviewed by, Submitted by, etc.

I've personally seen CVS commits lack these fields, which seems to
depend on where within the tree the commit is being done.  It hasn't yet
annoyed me enough to ask someone why.  It is annoying though.

-- 
Glen Barber | gjb at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Documentation Project

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-doc/attachments/20111010/b68183a6/signature.pgp