cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/5-roadmap article.sgml

Giorgos Keramidas keramida at freebsd.org
Mon Sep 17 15:27:13 PDT 2007


On 2007-09-18 00:12, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri <almarrie at gmail.com> wrote:
>On 9/18/07, Gabor Kovesdan <gabor at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>Giorgos Keramidas escribi??:
>>> keramida    2007-09-17 21:02:43 UTC
>>>
>>>   FreeBSD doc repository
>>>
>>>   Modified files:
>>>     en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/5-roadmap article.sgml
>>>   Log:
>>>   Avoid using "It was", but use a more explicit reference to the
>>>   version-guide article in the abstract of 5-roadmap.  This way
>>>   the text is a bit less confusing.
>>
>> Shouldn't this be nuked? I remember it came to the topic some time ago,
>> but we won't have
>> any new releases from 5.X any more and it has only a historical
>> significance.
>
> When you go on and keep reading, and follow the links you feel the 5.x
> task isn't completed yet, and I feel it's misleading, I would suggest
> you make docs for FreeBSD 7.x Road Map or even 8.x

That's odd.  After reading this in the current abstract:

      <para> This document is now mostly of historical value.  It
        presented a roadmap for the development of &os;'s &t.releng.5;
        branch.  It was originally written in February 2003 (between
        the 5.0 and 5.1 releases), and was intended to provide a plan
        for making the &t.releng.5; branch <quote>stable</quote>, both
        in terms of code quality and finalization of various
        APIs/ABIs.  For a different perspective, the article
        <ulink url="&url.articles.version-guide;">
          <quote>Choosing the &os; Version That Is Right For You</quote>
        </ulink>
        may be of interest.  The version-guide article was written in August
        2005 (two and a half years later), and it contains a section
        discussing how these plans and events actually unfolded, as well as
        some lessons learned.</para>

it was obvious to me that the article is *not* describing the current
state of affairs.  Any suggestions about improving the text to make it
less confusing for people who just happen to stumble upon it now, are
very welcome :)



More information about the cvs-doc mailing list