cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/5-roadmap article.sgml
keramida at FreeBSD.org
Mon Sep 17 14:12:16 PDT 2007
On 2007-09-17 23:07, Gabor Kovesdan <gabor at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> Giorgos Keramidas escribi?:
>> keramida 2007-09-17 21:02:43 UTC
>> FreeBSD doc repository
>> Modified files:
>> en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/5-roadmap article.sgml Log:
>> Avoid using "It was", but use a more explicit reference to the
>> version-guide article in the abstract of 5-roadmap. This way
>> the text is a bit less confusing.
> Shouldn't this be nuked? I remember it came to the topic some time
> ago, but we won't have any new releases from 5.X any more and it has
> only a historical significance.
No, the abstract has been retrofitted to the current state of things,
and it explicitly mentions now that it is not a roadmap of "things to
come", but a document of historical significance.
The lessons it contains are described in the context of the older 5.X
release series, so it is not a good idea to barge in and "fix" what is
no longer "current", but the text explains some of the release
engineering challenges the Project faced in the 5.X series, so keeping
it alive (instead of "cvs rm"-ing it) is still useful :)
More information about the cvs-doc