cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook Makefile txtfiles.ent doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install chapter.sgml

[Ben Kaduk]

Thanks!

I was pretty sure that the ``visual kernel configuartion'' was an
antique, but I didn't have access to a &os; box when I was looking at
it.

By the way, I also noticed that (at least in one chapter) we mix
together using a literal ``FreeBSD'' and ``&os;''; the example I
counted was approx 150 FreeBSD and 50 &os; -- is there a reason to
prefer one to the other?  The comment in freebsd.ent points out that
they are very unlikely to be different, but would we really only want
to turn some instances into links?
It's probably not worth the repo-churn to make them consistent, I'm
just curious.

-Ben Kaduk

On 6/30/07, Chin-San Huang <chinsan at freebsd.org> wrote:
> chinsan     2007-06-30 18:12:31 UTC
>
>   FreeBSD doc repository
>
>   Modified files:
>     en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook Makefile txtfiles.ent
>     en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install chapter.sgml
>   Log:
>   - Update the deprecated section about "Visual kernel configuration".
>   - Attach the newly screenshot of country-config for FreeBSD 6.2 -R and later.
>
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.106     +1 -0      doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/Makefile
>   1.350     +30 -51    doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install/chapter.sgml
>   1.4       +1 -0      doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/txtfiles.ent
> _______________________________________________
> cvs-doc at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-doc
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-doc-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>