cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml

[Michael W. Lucas]

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 03:22:00PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On the other hand, ACPI seems to work fine on my 600E these days,
> although I'll admit that I don't pull it out of the drawer very
> often. ACPI didn't work in the past, though. 
> 
> Maybe:
>           <para>FreeBSD supports <acronym>APM</acronym> on certain machines.
>             Please look in the <filename>LINT</filename> (V4.x or the
> 	    <filename>NOTES</filename> (V5.x) kernel config file,
>             searching for the <acronym>APM</acronym> keyword.  Further
>             information can be found in &man.apm.4;.</para>
> 
> 	  <para>FreeBSD 5.X and later support the
> 	    <acronym>ACPI</acronym> features found in most modern
> 	    hardware.  Further information can be found in
> 	    &man.acpi.4;. If a system supports both
> 	    <acronym>APM</acronym> and <acronym>ACPI</acronym>, either
> 	    can be used. You will probably want to try both and use the
> 	    one which works best for your system.
> 	</para>
> 
> In any case, the word "supports" in the second paragraph should be
> changed to "support" for proper agreement with the subject.

Thanks for the wordage, I changed the Q&A.


-- 
Michael W. Lucas	mwlucas at FreeBSD.org, mwlucas at BlackHelicopters.org
		http://www.BlackHelicopters.org/~mwlucas/

"The cloak of anonymity protects me from the nuisance of caring." -Non Sequitur