cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml
Pav Lucistnik
pav at FreeBSD.org
Fri Mar 11 09:37:11 GMT 2005
Marc Fonvieille píše v čt 10. 03. 2005 v 23:36 +0100:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 04:54:55PM +0000, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > pav 2005-03-10 16:54:55 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD doc repository (ports committer)
> >
> > Modified files:
> > en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml
> > Log:
> > - X section
> > * Replace question about how to compile XFree86 3.x app with XFree86-4
> > libraries with a question how to install X.org when system defaults
> > to XFree86-4 and vice versa.
> >
>
> <qandaentry>
> <question id="xfree86-version">
> - <para>An X app I am building depends on &xfree86; 3.3.X, but I
> - have &xfree86; 4.X installed. What should I do?</para>
> + <para>I want to install different <application>X</application>
> + server.</para>
> </question>
>
> You should not use application tags for the term "X" (server), it's not
> an application but more a "family". For example you will not write
> <application>C compiler</application>, but
> <application>gcc</application> is correct.
Actually, trhodes told me to add it there.
> <answer>
> - <para>To tell the port build to link to the &xfree86; 4.X libraries,
> - add the following to <filename>/etc/make.conf</filename>, (if you
> - do not have this file, create it):</para>
> -
> - <programlisting>XFREE86_VERSION= 4</programlisting>
> + <para>&os; versions prior 5.3 will use the default &xfree86;
> + 4.X, while latter verions will default to &xorg;.
> + If you want to run different <application>X</application>
>
> Same thing here. <application>&xfree86; </application> and
> <application>&xorg;</application> should also be used.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-install.html
>
> may be a good example on "X11 terms tagging."
"Now this is interesting."
What would you say to the attached patch, which
-) removes <application> tags around X
-) adds <application> tags around xfree and xorg entities
-) fixes a typo verions -> versions
-) rewords different X system -> different X11 implementation
?
--
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
<pav at FreeBSD.org>
lofi> My _sympathetic_ opinion about kdevelop is that it's a huge pile
of shit that might at least work okay if used in Linux.
lofi> My neutral opinion is that it's just a huge pile of shit.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: faq-xfree86-minors.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1346 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-doc/attachments/20050311/cadba6b2/faq-xfree86-minors.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-doc/attachments/20050311/cadba6b2/attachment.bin
More information about the cvs-doc
mailing list