cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs article.sgml

Ken Smith kensmith at cse.Buffalo.EDU
Thu Apr 15 20:37:49 PDT 2004


On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 10:56:24PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 12:52:23PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> > In the text they are used to describe how much space each release, and
> > now the release numbers will be updated without the space requirements
> > being updated per release.  Therefor new mirrors cannot easily see if
> > the space requirements are out of date...
> >
> 
> I think you are right.  Let's hubs people to confirm it and then I'll
> back out the change.

To be honest with you given the ports/ section of the FTP site is
probably an order of magnitude larger than the next largest thing and
tends to have a life of its own we might be best off just putting a
date there instead of an OS revision.  The CVS repository is probably
the same - ports dwarfs the mainline system, and gnats/mailing-lists
dwarfs ports.  :-)

If you agree I can revise the numbers to current estimates and put
in "(as of April 2004)".

-- 
						Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to      |       kensmith at cse.buffalo.edu
  there, funny things are everywhere.   |
                      - Theodore Geisel |


More information about the cvs-doc mailing list