cvs commit: ports/net/haproxy Makefile distinfo
araujobsdport at gmail.com
Fri May 25 03:32:14 UTC 2012
2012/5/25 Eitan Adler <eadler at freebsd.org>
> On 24 May 2012 19:03, Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport at gmail.com> wrote:
> > OK Eitan,
> > I need to say sorry to everybody, because for security issues, I never
> > asked anyone for approvals in case there is a maintainer time out.
> > My BAD!
> Note that security fixes may cause their own problems (the fix breaks
> everything else?). This is why explicit approval is needed. The
> maintainer should usually be contacted but in extreme cases portmgr or
> so may approve as well. (IMHO it should be expanded to secteam... but
Well, we are talking specifically in the case of haproxy. It doesn't break
anything right, does it?
So, I do believe there is no problem with that commit.
araujo at FreeBSD.org
More information about the cvs-all