cvs commit: ports/devel/adime Makefile ports/x11-wm/icewm
Makefile ports/graphics/scr2png Makefile ports/x11/xbindkeys
danfe at FreeBSD.org
Mon Feb 20 04:14:49 UTC 2012
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 09:47:54PM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 01:23:36 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > "Wine argument" does not sound too technical to me.
> I have no clue what that means, but at this juncture it is irrelevant.
Mikhail made a reference to buying a bottle of dry red wine in a store in
the original email which you've sent me the link to. Not sure why you
didn't notice it. :-)
> > Thus, it's safer to always specify it. At least it allows to catch
> > versions inconsistencies earlier.
> No, it is not always safer to specify it; and by the time I saw your
> latest contribution to this thread, I see that dougb@ has done a
> splendid job of trying to explain the opposing viewpoint to you rather
Yes, he did (as always).
> I trust that has satiated your desire for people to repeat the
> technical components of discussion that had already been archived on
Right, sorry I didn't catch the point originally from mi at . I was viewing
the issue from a limited angle. Doug pointed out exact deficiency in my
thinking and provided real scenario when it can be a bummer (that is, if
one wants to hold shlib dependency while being able to chase updates of
the leaf ports). Previously I did not consider that dependency might be
held for some reason.
More information about the cvs-all