cvs commit: ports/emulators/wine Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
danfe at FreeBSD.org
Mon May 16 01:28:05 UTC 2011
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 01:08:19PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:59:20PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > Carefully selected and reasonable defaults is one of the strong sides
> > of ports (and thus packages) that we offer, despite all aforementioned
> > drawbacks.
> User feedback at the last 2 conferences that I have been to, is that we
> are insufficiently consistent in our defaults. (In particular, X11 and
> CUPS are frequently mentioned as offenders; there are others.) This
> primarily affects our default-built packages.
I would say there is only minor CUPS inconsistency (most of the times it
is correctly disabled; few remaining ports should be converted I think);
for X11 it's a bit more tricky: roughly, if a port is likely enough to
be used in non-X11 environment (or it's a server only thing), no X11
support by default seems reasonable for package. Otherwise having X11
dependency is natural, since those bits would be installed by 99% of
desktop users anyways.
More information about the cvs-all