cvs commit: ports/lang/gcc46 Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
Gerald Pfeifer
gerald at pfeifer.com
Sat Jun 11 15:29:16 UTC 2011
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Greg Larkin wrote:
> I guess I can close PR 157396 now? Shall I assume that you'd still
> like to remove Java support from the lang/gcc* ports, if possible?
I think you can close the PR, yes.
As for removing Java support, I think having one instance of lang/gcc*
with Java support should be sufficient, so now with lang/gcc46 featuring
that, can we remove that from lang/gcc45? (That only means changing the
USE_GCC line in pkdftk, I think?
> Building pdftk with OpenJDK is the preferred solution. If that doesn't
> work, I want to test if I can kick off a gcc+gcj build from the pdftk
> port, use it to build a static pdftk, then clean everything up without
> permanently installing gcc+gcj. Let me know if you think that will be
> too messy.
That sounds really heavy for users of pdftk, and I think we should have a
version of lang/gcc that does not require that. BUT, that also could be a
special version, a slave port with some special option set that the vast
majority of users odes not need to worry about. Something for later, I
guess; for now removing Java support from lang/gcc45 (and first adjusting
pdftk) would be the next step I think?
Gerald
More information about the cvs-all
mailing list