[ports] cvs commit: ports/devel/rubygem-stringex Makefile
danfe at FreeBSD.org
Tue Jan 11 09:55:26 UTC 2011
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:11:09AM +0000, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 07:51:57AM +0000, Wen Heping wrote:
> > wen 2011-01-11 07:51:54 UTC
> > Modified files:
> > devel/rubygem-stringex Makefile distinfo
> > Log:
> > - Revert my last commit to avoid break other ports.
> > --- ports/devel/rubygem-stringex/Makefile:1.4 Tue Jan 11 07:01:33 2011
> > +++ ports/devel/rubygem-stringex/Makefile Tue Jan 11 07:51:54 2011
> > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> > # XXX: datamapper requires exact version ~>
> > PORTNAME= stringex
> > -PORTVERSION= 1.2.0
> > +PORTVERSION= 1.1.0
> > PORTEPOCH= 1
> Does this changes (i.e. revert back) make sense to bump PORTEPOCH?
If the port was reverted quickly enough, it should be OK to skip the
rule. Like here, it was done within an hour, which is probably OK. But
the maintainer has final vote anyways.
More information about the cvs-all