cvs commit: ports/devel/thrift Makefile

Boris Samorodov bsam at passap.ru
Thu Dec 8 22:28:14 UTC 2011


09.12.2011 02:01, Gabor Kovesdan пишет:
> Em 08-12-2011 22:51, Boris Samorodov escreveu:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> sorry for those questions but they really were not answered at the
>> commit log message and previous answers.
>>
>> 09.12.2011 01:02, Michael Scheidell пишет:
>>
>>>>  Maintainer awol.
>> Awol to what?
> Commit log says timeout of 100 days.

Well, it was definitely other commit. This commit has no references
to any PR.

> Afaik, 14 days mean normal timeout 
> and 90 days long-time maintainer inactivity. Somewhere it is documented. 
> Correct me if I'm wrong.

I'm not opposed to the maintainer switch here. I try to mark up
questions that occure after rather small commit log.

>>>>  Committer has agreed to maintain port.
>> Agreed how?
>>
> He referred to submitter whom he asked via private mail.

OK. The I suppose that all those facts should be reflected at the
commit log. I.e.:
. switch maintainership to the submitter [1].

PR: ports/NNNNN [1]
Approved by: former maintainer (timeout ... days),  [1]
             current maintainer (via private email)


> Please forgive to Michael for the commit logs, he is a new committer and 
> he is on his learning path and trying to improve commit messages and 
> learn conventions.

There is absolutely no need to ask for forgiveness. It's all OK, we are
all human. The main goal of those my emails is to help newcomer(s) do a
better job.

-- 
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve


More information about the cvs-all mailing list