cvs commit: doc/fr_FR.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/multimedia
chapter.sgml doc/fr_FR.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mirrors chapter.sgml
blackend at FreeBSD.org
Sun Sep 12 18:17:55 UTC 2010
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 04:45:45PM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Gabor PALI wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Remko Lodder <remko at elvandar.org> wrote:
> > Having translations in the first place makes people trigger, when I started the doc-nl project, there were translations in progress all the time and people got onboard because someone showed
> > an example.
> > All right, I accept. Then let me add another question: why the outdated translations are user-visible (i.e. compiled to HTML, PS, PDF, RTF) and possibly published on each release?
BTW I dont understand why people are translating outdated docs...
> Same answer. You honestly cannot judge about other translation teams
> on their reasoning why things are and arent. The world aint perfect
> and we should accept that. We can motivate people to some degree, and
> then well something is better then nothing.
> But I feel you are pushing 'things'. So I suggest that you write
> something that keeps our documentation automatically in sync,
> translated. If that isn't possible for some reason then please let the
> various groups decide what they can and cannot do.
I agree. If you annoy too much people, they'll stop spending their free
time on the project.
More information about the cvs-all