cvs commit: ports/sysutils/nvclock/files patch-src::Makefile.in

[Remko Lodder]

On Sep 11, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:33:20AM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote:
>> On Sep 11, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>>> 
>>> Closes PR:      ports/149434
>> 
>> We refer to this as
>> 
>> PR:	<category>/<number>
> 
> In most cases, yes, absolutely, but:
> 
> The committed patch was not from the PR; submitter suggested marking the
> port as jobs-unsafe (and I hate marking ports unsafe or broken instead of
> properly fixing them).  Technically, I could have omitted any attribution
> whatsoever, but decided to do it nonetheless (making clear that commit
> merely closes the PR, not taking any code/idea from it).  Thanks for
> asking though.
> 
> ./danfe

no, when refering to a PR we always do that.

We can tell in the changelog itself that the PR had not been used itself.


-- 
/"\   Best regards,                        | remko at FreeBSD.org
\ /   Remko Lodder                      | remko at EFnet
X    http://www.evilcoder.org/    |
/ \   ASCII Ribbon Campaign    | Against HTML Mail and News