cvs commit: ports/textproc/xqilla Makefile distinfo

Alexey Dokuchaev danfe at FreeBSD.org
Fri Jul 16 13:09:00 UTC 2010


On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 08:08:43PM +0800, Vanilla Hsu wrote:
> xqilla 2.2.4 required xerces-c version 3.x, that's why i did not commit this
> pr.

Which in turn raises these questions:

- Why PR number was not referenced in the commit log? (148273)
- Why didn't you (vanilla@) added the requirement for new xerces in audit
  log, and/or marked the PR as analyzed or pending feedback?
- If 2.2.4 is totally broken with current xerces-c, how is that possible
  at all that this got committed?  It suggests that no required run-time
  testing was done, if even build fails.  Am I missing something, or
  things got really bad here?

./danfe

> 
> 2010/7/16 Pietro Cerutti <gahr at freebsd.org>
> 
> > gahr        2010-07-16 10:14:11 UTC
> >
> >  FreeBSD ports repository
> >
> >  Modified files:
> >    textproc/xqilla      Makefile distinfo
> >  Log:
> >  - Update to 2.2.4
> >
> >  Approved by:    maintainer (timeout after 15 days)


More information about the cvs-all mailing list