cvs commit: ports MOVED

[Peter Jeremy]

On 2008-Nov-18 18:33:08 -0500, Robert Noland <rnoland at freebsd.org> wrote:
>I do agree with flz.  All of the xorg provided drivers follow the
>xf86-xxx-xxx naming convention.

I'll take the opposing PoV and suggest that xf86-input-xxx can be
interpreted as 'X.org driver supporting input from device xxx' whereas
'input-xxx' doesn't indicate what it interfaces to.

>  I don't really care what it is called,
>as long as one can clearly determine what drivers are provided by xorg
>and which are not.

Why is this important?

-- 
Peter Jeremy
Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement
an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/attachments/20081120/85fbb1b8/attachment.pgp