cvs commit: ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster/files portmaster.sh.in

[Henrik Brix Andersen]

On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 04:50:45PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> 
>> Yeah, looks a bit odd - I wonder why the revision number of that file
>> was suddently bumped from 1.28 to 2.0 by CVS...
> 
> There is no mystery. :) I bumped the version on all the files in the port 
> to match the new version 2.0 for portmaster itself. See the commit log for 
> more information on why.

That's not exactly "standard procedure", is it? I mean, no other ports
have a direct relation between their version and the revision of their
Makefile in FreeBSD ports?

Why would this be needed for portmaster? I couldn't seem to find any
explanation in your commit log?

Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix at FreeBSD.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 217 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/attachments/20080125/867ee97f/attachment.pgp