obsoleteing PORTREVISION bumps (Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/icu)
Jeremy Messenger
mezz7 at cox.net
Thu Feb 7 15:09:59 PST 2008
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:01:36 -0600, Mikhail Teterin
<mi+mill at aldan.algebra.com> wrote:
> четвер 07 лютий 2008 05:42 по, Pav Lucistnik Ви написали:
>> > Why can't the package-building infrastructure put the
>> > two-and-two together and figure out, that the dependent ports need
>> > rebuilding /without/ explicit PORTREVISION bump?
>>
>> Where are the patches?
>
> Pav, this is insincere. As a portmgr member you know, that I have, in
> fact,
> contributed patches. Some of them are even in the bsd.port.mk. With that
> aside, let's continue...
>
> The package-building is in capable hands, I'm sure -- actual patches
> (implementation) is not the problem. I'm pointing at a /design/ flaw.
> Pointing it out should be sufficient.
What about the users that who are using ports, not packages? The
PORTREVISION is need or/and add info in /usr/ports/UPDATING about
reinstall these ports that depend on icu.
Cheers,
Mezz
> Best,
>
> -mi
--
mezz7 at cox.net - mezz at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src)
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome at FreeBSD.org
http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - multimedia at FreeBSD.org
More information about the cvs-all
mailing list