cvs commit: src/include pthread_np.h src/lib/libthr pthread.map
des at des.no
Mon Feb 4 03:29:20 PST 2008
"Attilio Rao" <attilio at freebsd.org> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des at des.no> writes:
> > I'm having second thoughts about this one. There is a significant
> > risk of false positives if the mutex is currently locked by another
> > thread. I'm wondering whether to a) change the implementation so it
> > only returns true if the mutex is owned by the current thread, or b)
> > change the interface so you can specify a specific thread, or NULL
> > for "any".
> Please don't do the latter. Semantically the right thing to do here
> is to assert if the curthread owns the lock or not. Any lock should
> not be interested on what is the state in regard of other locks.
Thank you. That was my thought as well, but I didn't want to exclude
the alternative without discussion.
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no
More information about the cvs-all