cvs commit: ports/security/sshguard Makefile

Mij mij at bitchx.it
Fri Mar 2 19:01:21 UTC 2007


On 02/mar/07, at 17:49, Kris Kennaway wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:06:14AM +0000, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote:
>> clsung      2007-03-01 10:06:14 UTC
>>
>>   FreeBSD ports repository
>>
>>   Modified files:
>>     security/sshguard    Makefile
>>   Log:
>>   - respect maintainer's insist on interactive part,
>>     even IS_INTERACTIVE is discouraged

not glad to see such comment


> This is disappointing.  Can the maintainer explain why?

the app requires the user to choose what firewall to support for  
building: IPFW or PF.
They are in XOR and there is no reasonable default in this.

Cheng-Lung chose PF default and removed is_interactive.
A feedback request would have avoided this qui pro quo.


>>   - PORTREVISION is thus bumped.
>>
>>   Approved by:    maintainer (implicit)
>
>> | +.if ! ( (defined(WITH_PF) && !defined(WITH_IPFW)) || !defined 
>> (WITH_PF))
>> | +# some error occurred. Configure will handle this.
>> | +.endif
>
> And what is this? :)

this used to be ".error blah"  for checking the options' XOR-ness,  
then removed because
options are also set when deinstalling/cleaning etc. Definitely  
useless, replacing with a
comment about the problem appears the best to do. Actually I dunno  
why this made its way
in the submission :)

bye




More information about the cvs-all mailing list