cvs commit: ports/security/sshguard Makefile
Mij
mij at bitchx.it
Fri Mar 2 19:01:21 UTC 2007
On 02/mar/07, at 17:49, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:06:14AM +0000, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote:
>> clsung 2007-03-01 10:06:14 UTC
>>
>> FreeBSD ports repository
>>
>> Modified files:
>> security/sshguard Makefile
>> Log:
>> - respect maintainer's insist on interactive part,
>> even IS_INTERACTIVE is discouraged
not glad to see such comment
> This is disappointing. Can the maintainer explain why?
the app requires the user to choose what firewall to support for
building: IPFW or PF.
They are in XOR and there is no reasonable default in this.
Cheng-Lung chose PF default and removed is_interactive.
A feedback request would have avoided this qui pro quo.
>> - PORTREVISION is thus bumped.
>>
>> Approved by: maintainer (implicit)
>
>> | +.if ! ( (defined(WITH_PF) && !defined(WITH_IPFW)) || !defined
>> (WITH_PF))
>> | +# some error occurred. Configure will handle this.
>> | +.endif
>
> And what is this? :)
this used to be ".error blah" for checking the options' XOR-ness,
then removed because
options are also set when deinstalling/cleaning etc. Definitely
useless, replacing with a
comment about the problem appears the best to do. Actually I dunno
why this made its way
in the submission :)
bye
More information about the cvs-all
mailing list