cvs commit: ports/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs Makefile distinfo ports/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs/files extra-patch-ublio patch-libntfs-3g-device_io.c patch-libntfs-3g__device.c patch-libntfs-3g__unix_io.c patch-src-ntfs-3g.c pkg-message.in unix_io_raw.c

[Alejandro Pulver]

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:05:22 +0000
Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe at FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:02:34AM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:01:33AM +0000, Alejandro Pulver wrote:
> > 
> > > alepulver    2007-06-07 04:01:33 UTC
> > > 
> > >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > > 
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     sysutils/fusefs-ntfs Makefile distinfo 
> > >   Added files:
> > >     sysutils/fusefs-ntfs/files extra-patch-ublio 
> > >                                patch-libntfs-3g__device.c 
> > >                                patch-libntfs-3g__unix_io.c 
> > >                                pkg-message.in 
> > >   Removed files:
> > >     sysutils/fusefs-ntfs/files patch-libntfs-3g-device_io.c 
> > >                                patch-src-ntfs-3g.c unix_io_raw.c 
> > 
> > Why did you rename patch files? Please back this out.
> 
> This is not the first time I've seen people rename existing patch files,
> while IIRC current policy tells us to abstain from doing so.  Only new
> files are subject to new (more strict) naming rules.  Let's follow the
> guidelines.
> 

Hello.

I think there has been a misunderstanding here: the removed patch file
is for device_io.c, and the added one for device.c which are different
files with different sets of changes.

Best Regards,
Ale
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/attachments/20070613/456792eb/signature.pgp