cvs commit: ports/x11/libX11 Makefile distinfo manpages pkg-plist ports/x11/libX11/files patch-src_ImUtil.c

[Alexander Botero-Lowry]

> 
> --DSPAM_MULTIPART_EX-523
> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-6wSIHTfdhfM3B
> pdcDmHT"
> 
> --=-6wSIHTfdhfM3BpdcDmHT
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> Kris Kennaway p=ED=B9e v st 06. 06. 2007 v 16:04 -0400:
> > On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 04:25:03PM +0000, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > pav         2007-06-06 16:25:03 UTC
> > >=20
> > >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > >=20
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     x11/libX11           Makefile distinfo manpages pkg-plist=20
> > >   Removed files:
> > >     x11/libX11/files     patch-src_ImUtil.c=20
> > >   Log:
> > >   - Update to 1.1.2
> > >   - Don't remove lib/X11, it's in mtree
> >=20
> > BTW, we had decided not to do minor updates to the X.org ports without
> > a good reason.  The disruption caused by frequent tiny updates is
> > tremendous.
> 
> Why not? There are no consequences in updating to dot-dot releases here.
> I was told by flz and anholt that I'm free to help out keeping X ports
> up to date.
I agree, regular updates should be an advantage we gain from the new ports. We do need
to be ever diligent though, for example our damageproto and xserver seem to be out of sync
such that when using a mesagl app it will error out. So, I think the best course of action
is regular minor updates, but done cautiously.

Otherwise, why am I waiting 8 hours for pkg_create to finish?

Alex