cvs commit: ports/security/krb5 Makefile

[Stefan Schablowski]

> Do people prefer to have the documentation installed
> by default with MIT KRB5 or would folks rather have
> the documentation only installed when specified in
> a make option?

I'd opt for the latter option, having the doc only installed on demand.

I would help a lot already, though, if the new knob was documented in a
way that noobs like me understand, so I don't have to gaze at the
Makefile diff scratching my head...

CU Stefan 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cy.Schubert at komquats.com [mailto:Cy.Schubert at komquats.com] 
> Sent: Monday, 15 January 2007 3:55 p.m.
> To: ports-committers at FreeBSD.org; cvs-ports at FreeBSD.org; 
> cvs-all at FreeBSD.org; freebsd-ports at FreeBSD.org; Jim Davis; 
> Stefan Schablowski
> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/krb5 Makefile
> 
> In message <200701140513.l0E5DX9w038711 at repoman.freebsd.org>, 
> Cy Schubert write
> s:
> > cy          2007-01-14 05:13:32 UTC
> > 
> >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > 
> >   Modified files:
> >     security/krb5        Makefile 
> >   Log:
> >   Include new documentation dependencies.
> >   
> >   Conditionally build and install documentation using a new knob.
> >   
> >   Revision  Changes    Path
> >   1.109     +12 -2     ports/security/krb5/Makefile
> 
> I've received a couple of complaints so far from folks who 
> aren't enamoured with the fact that texinfo or teTeX, and 
> dvips are required to build the MIT KRB5 port. I've put a 
> knob in the port to disable building and installing MIT's 
> KRB5 documentation. Do people prefer to have the 
> documentation installed by default with MIT KRB5 or would 
> folks rather have the documentation only installed when 
> specified in a make option?
> 
> 
> --
> Cheers,
> Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert at komquats.com>
> FreeBSD UNIX:  <cy at FreeBSD.org>   Web:  http://www.FreeBSD.org
> 
> 			e**(i*pi)+1=0
> 
> 
> 
> 
>