cvs commit: ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4 Makefile ports/emulators/linux_base-suse-9.1 Makefile ports/emulators/linux_base-suse-9.2 Makefile ports/emulators/linux_base-suse-9.3 Makefile ports/emulators/linux_dist-gentoo-stage1 Makefile ports/emu

Boris Samorodov bsam at ipt.ru
Thu Oct 5 09:09:46 PDT 2006


On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:49:53 +0400 Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 10/5/06, Boris Samorodov <bsam at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > bsam        2006-10-05 15:32:10 UTC
> >
> >   FreeBSD ports repository
> >
> >   Modified files:
> >     emulators/linux_base-fc4 Makefile
> >     emulators/linux_base-suse-9.1 Makefile
> >     emulators/linux_base-suse-9.2 Makefile
> >     emulators/linux_base-suse-9.3 Makefile
> >     emulators/linux_dist-gentoo-stage1 Makefile
> >     emulators/linux_dist-gentoo-stage2 Makefile
> >     emulators/linux_dist-gentoo-stage3 Makefile
> >     x11/linux-XFree86-libs Makefile
> >   Log:
> >   Remove deleted linux_base-* and linux_locale* ports from CONFLICTS variable
> >   of the remaining linux ports.
> >
> >   Reviewed by:    netchild (agreed in principle)

> IMHO, you really shouldn't do that. People with old packages
> installed should not worry about trying out new ports. Now you've
> opened a way for their systems to be messed up.

Well, we are speaking about already deleted ports. Once they were
deleted and user's ports tree updated any adding/removing should be
done according to /usr/ports/UPDATING (i.e. reading about default
linux_base port and how to upgrade).

Once a user uses fixed ports tree and pre-built packages there should
be no problems.


WBR
-- 
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP
FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve


More information about the cvs-all mailing list