keramida at FreeBSD.org
Sun Nov 12 19:02:50 UTC 2006
On 2006-11-13 05:27, Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy at optushome.com.au> wrote:
>On Sun, 2006-Nov-12 12:14:31 +0100, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
>> SSH is the protocol, and ssh is the application/program (so
>> <application></application> or <command></command> according to the
> To be pedantic, the application is OpenSSH.
Well, right now, yes. But it is "a member of the family of applications
which implement the `SSH' protocol". I am not saying that this can
actually happen real soon now, but if OpenSSH doesn't work the way we
want it to work, it is possible that our <application>SSH</application>
in a few years will be <application>FooSSH</application>.
When the 'Open' part of 'OpenSSH' is important, it is obligatory that
we mention and make it stand out (if not for any other reason, as a form
of our appreciation for the work of the OpenSSH folks). But when we
talk about the 'SSH' protocol in general, do we really have to do so?
More information about the cvs-all