cvs commit: CVSROOT modules ports/www Makefile ports/www/linux-flashplugin6 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist

Hiroki Sato hrs at
Thu May 25 06:28:31 PDT 2006

"Simon L. Nielsen" <simon at> wrote
  in <20060525125011.GI1088 at>:

si> On 2006.05.24 08:00:53 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
si> >  I also think it is good to remove this because of the security flaw,
si> >  but is it true that in such cases we need to set DEPRECATED and
si> >  EXPIRATION_DATE in advance?  Or, is it no problem with removing
si> >  it immediately?
si> Normally I use EXPIRATION_DATE, but since this has already been
si> deleted once I don't see a big need to wait with removing it again,
si> but that's up to you.  As long as it keeps the FORBIDDEN tag I don't
si> have a problem with waiting a bit.

 Thanks, I set EXPIRATION_DATE to June 7 since I do not want to give
 an impression of sudden occurrence again just like the flashplugin
 removal ;)

| Hiroki SATO
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the cvs-all mailing list