cvs commit: ports/ftp/gwget Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/ftp/gwget/files patch-src__gwget_data.c patch-src_gwget_data.c patch-src_main.c patch-src_wget-log.c

[Andrew Pantyukhin]

On 5/11/06, Vasil Dimov <vd at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:08:09PM +0000, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > sat         2006-05-10 19:08:09 UTC
> [...]
> >   1.1       +10 -0     ports/ftp/gwget/files/patch-src__gwget_data.c (new)
> >   1.2       +0 -10     ports/ftp/gwget/files/patch-src_gwget_data.c (dead)
>
> About the patches filenaming under files/ we are trying to follow some
> convention - see ports/Tools/scripts/splitpatch.pl, it's best to always
> use that for generating the file names for new patches.

Thanks, I'll take a good look.

> The reason for not renaming all ports/*/*/files/* to conform to a single
> convention is that the history would be lost.
>
> You should avoid renaming files this way (whatever the new and the
> old names are) because the history is lost.

I understand this very clearly, the file had no history though,
it's just one missing header which should probable be pushed
upstream.

Thanks!