cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.README
Garance A Drosihn
drosih at rpi.edu
Thu Mar 9 20:03:22 UTC 2006
At 11:03 AM +0200 3/9/06, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>I can only suggest to make it spell "NO_MAN=", i.e.,
>without any value.
>Was there some discussion that I've missed?
In the thread on:
cvs commit: src/tools/regression/lib/libc/resolv Makefile
des made the comment:
"> > > No, the correct spelling is
> > > MAN=
> Since when? ...
Since we abandoned MAN[1-9]. The fact that many old Makefiles
still use NO_MAN doesn't make it right; NO_MAN is a user knob,
not a Makefile knob (same distinction as between WITH_FOO and
USE_FOO in the ports tree)
This is one of those issues that I have no personal opinion on,
other than I wanted lpr's makefiles to be "correct", for whatever
the consensus is for what "correct" means. I probably should
have waited for more discussion in that thread before making this
change, but I just happened to be looking over some code in 'lpr'
when I read the above comment, so I thought "I might as well fix
this as long as I'm right here...".
Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad at gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer or gad at freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih at rpi.edu
More information about the cvs-all