cvs commit: src/sys/dev/kbdmux kbdmux.c
ceri at submonkey.net
Wed Mar 1 05:56:01 PST 2006
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:39:36AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Coleman Kane wrote:
> >On 2/28/06, *Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav* <des at des.no <mailto:des at des.no>> wrote:
> > "Maksim Yevmenkin" <maksim.yevmenkin at gmail.com
> > <mailto:maksim.yevmenkin at gmail.com>> writes:
> > > we should make a decision which scancodes keyboard drivers should be
> > > returning and change kbdmux(4), syscons(4) etc. to support it.
> > >
> > > until then, i'm afraid, sun rs232 and powerpc adb keyboard drivers
> > > will have to translate their own scancodes into at scancodes (just
> > > like ukbd(4) does).
> > Considering that ukbd(4) is the only kbd driver that runs on all
> > platforms, it might make sense to have all other drivers translate
> > their scancodes to ukbd(4) scancodes and use that in kbdmux(4) and
> > syscons(4).
> >I agree, especially since atkbdc's are rapidly being replaced by USB on
> >the platforms they were made for.
> Long term, yes, but what is the risk/benefit of doing this for 6.1?
If it doesn't work, we look like bloody idiots. 6.2 isn't that far
away, I'd think that anybody could manage waiting for it a little more
(especially if it goes into RELENG_6 just after the 6.1 branch).
The above not to be taken as a comment on the change, on which I am not
informed enough to hold an opinion.
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/attachments/20060301/1e75697c/attachment.bin
More information about the cvs-all