cvs commit: ports/mail/sylpheed-claws Makefile distinfo
ports/mail/sylpheed-claws/files patch-src-mbox.c
Ion-Mihai Tetcu
itetcu at people.tecnik93.com
Wed Jun 21 08:21:36 UTC 2006
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:15:36 +0200
Alexander Leidinger <netchild at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> Quoting Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu at people.tecnik93.com> (from Wed, 21 Jun
> 2006 10:07:50 +0300):
>
> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 19:13:12 +0000 (UTC)
> > Alexander Leidinger <netchild at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> >
> >> netchild 2006-06-20 19:13:12 UTC
> >>
> >> FreeBSD ports repository
> >>
> >> Modified files:
> >> mail/sylpheed-claws Makefile distinfo
> >> Removed files:
> >> mail/sylpheed-claws/files patch-src-mbox.c
> >> Log:
> >> Update to 2.3.1.
> >
> > I think mail/sylpheed-claws-maildir should be bumped after each update,
> > else it fails to load. I'll bump PORTREVISION now and maybe you can add
> > this to your checklist or put a comment in sylpheed's Makefile ?
>
> Gotcha... I'm doing "portupgrade -f sylpheed-claws\*" on each update.
> It's not only the maildir plugin, it's every plugin.
Hmm, yes, this seems to be the case (I'm only using maildir plugin).
> Feel free to make a bugreport (they should use an plugin-API-version
> instead of comparing the version of SC).
Yup.
> So far I was too lazy to bump and to report to SC. Now I at least have no
> excuse to not bump the revision for the plugins... :-/
There are PRs for updating them, I just took them, but I won't have
time to commit until tonight so if you want just take them over.
I commited the maildir PR.
--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
BOFH excuse #447:
According to Microsoft, it's by design
More information about the cvs-all
mailing list