cvs commit: ports/mail/sylpheed-claws Makefile distinfo ports/mail/sylpheed-claws/files patch-src-mbox.c

Ion-Mihai Tetcu itetcu at people.tecnik93.com
Wed Jun 21 08:21:36 UTC 2006


On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:15:36 +0200
Alexander Leidinger <netchild at FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> Quoting Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu at people.tecnik93.com> (from Wed, 21 Jun  
> 2006 10:07:50 +0300):
> 
> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 19:13:12 +0000 (UTC)
> > Alexander Leidinger <netchild at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> >
> >> netchild    2006-06-20 19:13:12 UTC
> >>
> >>   FreeBSD ports repository
> >>
> >>   Modified files:
> >>     mail/sylpheed-claws  Makefile distinfo
> >>   Removed files:
> >>     mail/sylpheed-claws/files patch-src-mbox.c
> >>   Log:
> >>   Update to 2.3.1.
> >
> > I think mail/sylpheed-claws-maildir should be bumped after each update,
> > else it fails to load. I'll bump PORTREVISION now and maybe you can add
> > this to your checklist or put a comment in sylpheed's Makefile ?
> 
> Gotcha... I'm doing "portupgrade -f sylpheed-claws\*" on each update.  
> It's not only the maildir plugin, it's every plugin.

Hmm, yes, this seems to be the case (I'm only using maildir plugin).

>  Feel free to make a bugreport (they should use an plugin-API-version
> instead of  comparing the version of SC). 

Yup.

> So far I was too lazy to bump and to  report to SC. Now I at least have no 
> excuse to not bump the revision  for the plugins... :-/

There are PRs for updating them, I just took them, but I won't have
time to commit until tonight so if you want just take them over.

I commited the maildir PR.


-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

BOFH excuse #447:
According to Microsoft, it's by design




More information about the cvs-all mailing list