cvs commit: ports MOVED
pav at FreeBSD.org
Fri Jan 27 14:02:09 PST 2006
Kris Kennaway píše v pá 27. 01. 2006 v 16:51 -0500:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:49:03PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Kris Kennaway p??e v p? 27. 01. 2006 v 16:13 -0500:
> > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 07:41:01PM +0000, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > > | @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
> > > > | # Keep this list sorted in the chronological order. New entries must
> > > > | # be added at the tail.
> > > > | #
> > > > | +# If previously removed port gets restored, make sure to delete the relevant
> > > > | +# line.
> > >
> > > It's more than that, though. If an old port is copied to a new
> > > location and the old location is kept (e.g. upgraded to a later
> > > version), don't record it here.
> > Yes, I noticed few records like this, but I failed to come up with a
> > concise sentence to note this. I blame my lack of English-fu.
> > Would you mind suggesting a good wording for that?
> My second sentence above? :)
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
<pav at FreeBSD.org>
94 outdated ports on the box,
94 outdated ports.
Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done,
82 outdated ports on the box.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/attachments/20060127/1a3efbd4/attachment.bin
More information about the cvs-all