cvs commit: src/sys/dev/bge if_bge.c src/sys/dev/em if_em.c src/sys/dev/ixgb if_ixgb.c src/sys/dev/nge if_nge.c src/sys/dev/re if_re.c src/sys/dev/txp if_txp.c src/sys/dev/vge if_vge.c src/sys/net if_vlan.c if_vlan_var.h src/sys/net80211 ...

Doug Barton dougb at
Sat Jan 14 13:19:59 PST 2006

John Baldwin wrote:

> I'm not sure that's quite fair. :)  What happened is that his original patch 
> did work fine (and has been in HEAD for a while), but it changed the API, so 
> he did a quick fixup to restore the API in RELENG_6 and missed one file 
> during that subsequent update.

I should have been more clear. I wasn't asking if the change had been 
tested, I followed the thread where it was discussed for HEAD. What I should 
have asked is, "Did you test the change in RELENG_6 by at minimum building 
world and kernel before you committed?" Doing so would have caught the 
missed file, and avoided breakage in a -stable branch.



     This .signature sanitized for your protection

More information about the cvs-all mailing list