cvs commit: ports/sysutils/portupgrade Makefile distinfo

Ion-Mihai Tetcu itetcu at people.tecnik93.com
Sun Jan 1 09:10:34 PST 2006


On Sun, 1 Jan 2006 15:43:35 +0000 (UTC)
Norikatsu Shigemura <nork at FreeBSD.org> wrote:

>   (5) The frequency of INDEX generation on official site is now
> sufficient, recommend to run "portsdb -F" (fetch INDEX from official
> site) instead of "portsdb -U" (make INDEX by yourself) in portsdb(1).
> [1] 

>   PR:             ports/91164
>   Submitted by:   KOMATSU Shinichiro <koma2 at lovepeers.org>
> (maintainer) Pointed out by: Enrique Matias <cronopios at gmail dot
> com> [1]

This is a very bad idea; locally generated INDEX contains all
use-defined OPTIONS, etc. while the fetched one contains only the
defaults thus his has the potential to break the wonderful
upward-recursive usage of portupgrade.

I would rather recommend using sysutils/p5-FreeBSD-portindex to
generate the INDEX locally and fast.


I strongly suggest that this is backed-out (or at very least explained
i the man page).

-- 
IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

BOFH excuse #160:
non-redundant fan failure 




More information about the cvs-all mailing list