cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors contrib.committers.sgml contrib.develalumni.sgml

[Joel Dahl]

On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 20:12 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2006-02-10 19:06, Joel Dahl <joel at freebsd.org> wrote:
> >> You can use common sense though.  He was obviously a ports committer.
> > 
> > Guys, I'm lost.  What are we arguing about?
> > 
> > He was a ports committer, but I fail to see how that is important since
> > the Development Team Alumni doesn't differentiate between different
> > types of commit bits?
> > 
> > Maybe I was a bit unclear with the meaning of the "unclassified commit
> > bit" comment; it's just a reminder, since they're still in our access
> > files.  :-)
> 
> No arguing from me.  I mentioned he was the ports-meister, just in
> case the `unclassified' comment was meant to be a reminder of ``we
> don't know what this guy was working on''.
> 
> It's obvious that the comment is not, since it only mentions names
> listed in access.unclassified, so there's nothing to argue about.

Yep, everyone who is in access.unclassified has the "unclassified commit
bit" comment next to their name in the SGML source, but I can understand
if some people were confused by the "unclassified" discussion,
especially if they believed that asami was the only one who had that
comment next to his name.  :-)

-- 
Joel - joel at FreeBSD dot org