cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors
contrib.committers.sgml contrib.develalumni.sgml
Joel Dahl
joel at FreeBSD.org
Fri Feb 10 12:30:28 PST 2006
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 20:12 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2006-02-10 19:06, Joel Dahl <joel at freebsd.org> wrote:
> >> You can use common sense though. He was obviously a ports committer.
> >
> > Guys, I'm lost. What are we arguing about?
> >
> > He was a ports committer, but I fail to see how that is important since
> > the Development Team Alumni doesn't differentiate between different
> > types of commit bits?
> >
> > Maybe I was a bit unclear with the meaning of the "unclassified commit
> > bit" comment; it's just a reminder, since they're still in our access
> > files. :-)
>
> No arguing from me. I mentioned he was the ports-meister, just in
> case the `unclassified' comment was meant to be a reminder of ``we
> don't know what this guy was working on''.
>
> It's obvious that the comment is not, since it only mentions names
> listed in access.unclassified, so there's nothing to argue about.
Yep, everyone who is in access.unclassified has the "unclassified commit
bit" comment next to their name in the SGML source, but I can understand
if some people were confused by the "unclassified" discussion,
especially if they believed that asami was the only one who had that
comment next to his name. :-)
--
Joel - joel at FreeBSD dot org
More information about the cvs-all
mailing list